Tuesday evening’s Assembly meeting is shaping up to be a barnburner. Long, potentially contentious and chock full of intrigue. Unless you choose to ignore local government or have been living in a cave you’re surely aware of at least some of the issues before us. But, in the interest of disclosure, here are some highlights:
Given all this, along with several dozen other matters on our agenda, the Clerk has already tentatively scheduled a meeting for Wednesday, December 17, in case we don’t finish our work by the proscribed 11 pm deadline. I’m betting we don’t.
The biggest issues, if you believe the media, are the two remaining labor contracts that are set to expire on June 30. One of my “conservative” colleagues, who voted against the AMEA & IBEW contracts, told me he didn’t have a problem with the IAFF contract. Still, I expect he’ll vote against it, as he and his colleagues seem intent to vote against most, if not all, fiscal issues in an effort to create a perceived political advantage for their preferred mayoral candidate. That said, my prediction is that the firefighters’ contract will pass. While opponents will voice concerns about its length, five years, my conversations with the IAFF president left me confident that we can renegotiate terms if Anchorage suffers a significant fiscal downturn. Proponents will note the professionalism of the department, including the high survival rate of heart attack victims served by AFDÂ emergency medical technicians.
Expect more fireworks over the APDEA contract. One issue, MOA paying the salary of the APDEA president, appears to be off the table. In a recent post I cited this fact as particularly problematic for me and subsequently explained my concerns further to the current APDEA president. Since then APDEA sent a letter to MOA’s Employee Relations department voluntarily returning to a 50/50 sharing of the president’s salary (MOA pays half and APDEA pays half), which reflects the terms of the contract slated to expire in June. That alone saves the city more than $250,000 over the life of the contract. (If you like ironies consider that this letter is of the same ilk, a Memorandum of Agreement or Administrative Letter, that some of my colleagues consider illegal and expensive.) The length of the APDEA contract, five years, will come up again. Similar to the IAFF, APDEA has foregone scheduled raises during past economic crunches and, following the same conversation where I voiced my concerns about the president’s salary, I came away convinced we can work out similar arrangements in the future should they become necessary.
Another point of opposition to both contracts will be that they haven’t yet expired. That’s correct, they both expire on June 30, 2009. Here’s why I don’t consider that issue to preclude approval:
Just so we’re clear, here’s where I’m leaning on the issues listed above:
Of course, it’s only Sunday and we’ll see how things go Tuesday!
Regards,
Patrick
« Paying our way – Happy holidays! »
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Copyright - Patrick Flynn, All Rights Reserved
I think it is possible that the fee increases were to keep the same level of service. Building department is fee based. If fees are not received…then their level of service decreases. Lay offs?
Comment: Julie – 22. December 2008 @ 8:17 pm